Hey! My name’s Mike and I am going to start writing my own
articles for the site, however first I wanted to introduce myself, my
background with showdown, and what my articles will be like in the future.
I’m originally from New Jersey and so needless to say, growing
up in the 90s, I am a diehard Yankees fan. One of, if not my earliest memory,
is the Yankees winning in ‘96. I was undoubtedly spoiled.
Andy Pettitte was
always my guy (fun fact: he had the most wins in the majors from ’00-’09).
My best friend and I started playing Showdown in 2000 after
his cousin introduced him to the game. Fast forward about a decade and a half,
and we lived together after college. Being employed individuals we were able to
live out our childhood dreams and managed to complete the OG sets. He got 2000
and I got 2001, and let me tell you, 10 year old Mike would be super jealous.
Like many of you, when the 2002 (etc.) sets came out, we were reluctant to
embrace them as we liked the simplicity of the original game. When we played we
would go all in and just pick the best players we had at every position. At a
young age it was clearly biased towards the teams and players we liked. However
now that we’re “adults” we turned to our excel knowledge to get a little more
in-depth to figure out who really is the best player at each position. So kind
of in a compare and contrast evaluation to Matt’s posts of the highest point
players at each position, these are the highest value players at each position
based on my calculations.
The purpose was strictly to figure out what the best
offensive players were at each position. Defense mattered less since we
normally were having a drink while playing and so we kept it simple most of the
time. I have some defensive calculations but I’m not as fully behind them as I am
the offensive metrics and maybe I’ll do some more posts in the future that adds
that in. However, trying to properly weight it alongside the hitting created
some problems that I figured would be easier to ignore.
I chose to use the wOBA, and more specifically, weighted
runs created. It allowed me to connect major league stats to the charts in the
easiest manner (instead of calculating the weighted runs in showdown which
would open wormholes and too much statistical extrapolation). Here Fangraph
explains the mindset behind wOBA and here is the actual value
of each outcome per year. I debated taking each card and matching it to the
year’s data-however in the Showdown universe, all runs are created equal and
that was the whole purpose behind making these cards in the 2000/2001 style. So
I averaged these results to come up with the actual weighted run value of each
outcomes (for 1B+ I averaged 1B and 2B). One of the biggest short comings in
this data is that all Outs are created equal. Similarly to fielding, trying to
calculate the probabilities of different outs occurring and their results
created a lot more problems than solutions, so I chose to ignore it. Eventually
I’ll go back and break down the outs and the likelihood they advance runners,
but right now that data isn’t in my spreadsheet. I did however include speed
against the average catcher’s arm since in the hyperlink there is a value for SB
vs CS.
From here on out when I refer to AP it is the statistical average
pitcher of all MLB Showdown cards ever created in the ’00 and ’01 style from
here and the OG sets. This data will change as time goes on depending on the
cards that are made, however there are a lot of data points now and it shouldn’t
change too much going forward. AB is the average batter, done in the same way
as above.
In order to get the probability of each chart I compared
them to the AP. So I took the probability of them getting the advantage
(OB-C/20) and multiplied that by their chart’s weighted runs created and added
it to the average weighted runs created against the AP’s chart to get the total
expected runs created for each batter. Similarly this can be done in reverse
for pitchers, although the math isn’t quite as clean but I got it to work.
Since I know this is hard to understand even when talking in person, I’ll walk
you through what the “average” MLB Showdown Hitter and Pitcher looks like and
the math behind creating this rating.
This is the AB:
Average
|
HR
|
2.50
|
Batter
|
3B
|
0.51
|
On-Base
|
2B
|
2.49
|
7.99
|
1B+
|
0.62
|
Speed
|
1B
|
6.05
|
15.40
|
BB
|
4.02
|
290.55 Points
|
Out
|
3.81
|
To Give you a visual idea, the closest person (I had a few to choose that were close but I’m gonna stick with my Yankees) is:
For the AP I broke them down into Starters and relievers and
then combined those over 9 innings for my calculations.
Average
|
HR
|
0.05
|
Average
|
HR
|
0.06
|
RP
|
3B
|
-
|
SP
|
3B
|
-
|
Control
|
2B
|
0.05
|
Control
|
2B
|
0.78
|
3.86
|
1B+
|
-
|
3.68
|
1B+
|
-
|
IP
|
1B
|
1.69
|
IP
|
1B
|
1.84
|
1.17
|
BB
|
1.20
|
6.29
|
BB
|
1.18
|
155.71 Points
|
Out
|
16.35
|
405.24 Points
|
Out
|
16.14
|
So for Pitchers there’s a lot more options that are close to
the numbers, but I’ll broaden my horizons with these guys:
So now that you have an idea of what I’m working with:
I multiplied the AB
chart against the average expected runs by the amount of each result (ie .7059*4.02,
1.0935*0.62, etc as said in the link) and so you get the average expected runs for the AB of 18.26
per chart. However it won’t always be his advantage (really only ~1/5th
of the time) so you need to multiply those (18.26*.2). Then you need to do the
same thing for the AP’s chart and multiply that by 4/5ths and add those
together and you get the expected outcome of about 3.95 runs. If you double
this it’s just shy of 8 runs a game, which isn’t too far off of what the actual
average runs a game is for the MLB over the past ~70 years.
Obviously it’s not perfect, but I think it does a good job of
getting an idea of what the best cards are from an offensive stand point. Let
me know in the comments what the pros/cons are for doing it this way, or if you
want it explained further I’m more than happy to discuss. Would also love to hear who you guys think will be the top players for each position based on this calculation method!
Love this. big fan of the value break down of players. Makes me feel like a real manager
ReplyDeleteThat’s awesome and quite a lot to take in, I can’t wait to see what else you have for the site, and welcome aboard
ReplyDeleteGreat article, look forward to seeing more. This best friend of yours seems pretty cool too
ReplyDeleteHey guys I am new to the blog! My fiends and I have completed one season drafting 2000 players and we are about to start a season drafting 2001 players. Any one have any ideas of where to find sealed 2001 packs besides eBay?
ReplyDeleteThere's a Facebook group and then the subreddit. There's not a ton of sealed stuff left but it always manages to find it's way out there.
ReplyDeleteThanks. I just requested to join the Facebook group.
Delete